Connect with us


Frontiers in Pharmacology: challenges and gaps in psychedelic research

Psychedelic Health spoke to Miami University researchers about how future research can address research challenges and knowledge gaps in the field of psychedelics.



Systematic ayahuasca review shows changes to acute brain connectivity

The therapeutic benefits of many psychedelics have been clearly demonstrated through clinical trials, where the use of psilocybin-, ketamine-, and MDMA-assisted psychotherapy showed striking long-term improvements in addiction, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Yet, clear gaps in our knowledge of their mechanisms of action remain.

In a recent Research Topic – a special collection of articles – entitled What is up with psychedelics anyway? included in the Neuropharmacology section of the well-regarded journal Frontiers in Pharmacology, Professor Matthew McMurray, from Miami University’s Department of Psychology and colleagues, explored the mechanisms of psychedelic drugs in the context of the altered states of consciousness induced by the drugs, and how that relates to the therapeutic effect of these agents.

Psychedelic Health spoke to Professor McMuray and his post-doctoral researcher, Dr Ryan Rakoczy, about some of this Research Topic, current research challenges and knowledge gaps, and how future research could come to address them.

See also  Findings give new insight into how psychedelics help mental health

What are the current knowledge gaps regarding the mechanisms of action of psychedelics?

Mechanism is a tricky word. First, we must acknowledge that all drugs cause multiple effects, and that the mechanisms of each effect vary. For example, the mechanisms of psychedelic-induced hallucinations may differ from the mechanisms of the therapeutic effects of psychedelics. So, we must first choose an effect to study. 

Next, we much acknowledge that drug mechanisms exist at numerous levels, from cognitive/perceptual to systems-level neural circuits to bio-molecular processes. Psychedelic drugs clearly shift our cognition and perceptions through the hallucinations they induce at higher doses. Numerous human and animal studies have also shown that they have the power to grow and reshape neural circuits, within and between brain regions. These drugs also act on particular molecular targets, such as serotonergic receptors. All these mechanisms are independently well-studied, so perhaps the largest gap in the literature is the connection between them. 

See also  Ketamine’s action on potassium channels in neurons revealed 

To what extent do their molecular actions drive changes in brain circuits? To what extent do changes in perception reshape molecular processes? These are not simple questions to answer, and they are not unique to the field of psychedelic drugs; however, psychedelic drugs carry their unique challenges. 

There are often legal restrictions associated with these compounds that must be navigated, many of which preclude using them in human studies. This has led researchers to focus on animal studies but translating the findings from animal studies to humans is also challenging. Even in the existing human studies, there are a lack of standardized “tools” available to quantify and control for the highly subjective and variable responses to psychedelic drugs. For example, the lack of reliable placebo controls has been a significant barrier. This lack of standardized methods has made it challenging to draw conclusions across human studies. 

Lastly, we know that both treatment context and patient history matter, but controlling for these across studies is challenging, especially in the context of the aforementioned issues. So, there are many challenges to understanding the mechanisms of psychedelic drugs.

Despite these challenges, human and animal studies have begun to focus on a shared mechanism of all drugs that cause hallucinations: activation of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in the brain. Experiments using the selective 5-HT2A blocker ketanserin have shown that it can block many of the effects of psychedelics in both humans and rodents. More widespread use of this pharmacological tool is needed to truly understand the role of this receptor system, especially in clinical studies. 

However, despite sharing this one target (5-HT2A), psychedelic drugs (and ketanserin) are highly variable in their mechanisms and affect a wide array of other neurotransmitter systems, including dopamine and norepinephrine. These “off-target” effects are likely responsible for the unique pattern of each compound’s effects, but more research on this is clearly needed to relate these molecular targets with the neural and perceptual processes affected by each drug. A deeper understanding of the relationship between the micro- and the macro- processes affected by each drug will undoubtedly lead to more effective usage of these compounds in clinical settings.

What is the current understanding of how the altered state of consciousness (ASC) contributes to therapeutic benefits?

This is a major question in the field, and it’s hotly debated. It’s currently unclear how altered states of consciousness contribute to the therapeutic benefits of psychedelic drugs, or even if an altered state is required at all. 

There have been two approaches to studying this topic. First, blockade of the 5-HT2A receptor with ketanserin has been shown to block the hallucinations induced by psychedelics. This approach has been widely used in animal studies, but less frequently used in human studies. In animal studies, this approach has shown that ASC may not be required for many of the therapeutic benefits, but this has yet to be verified in well-controlled clinical studies. 

The second approach to studying this topic has been to administer sub-hallucinogenic doses of psychedelics (e.g., “micro-doses”). This approach has been widely used in both human and animal studies, but these studies have shown minimal and inconsistent findings that are challenging to interpret. Given the fast rate of metabolism of these compounds, it is unclear how much (if any) of the drug is reaching the brain, and major differences in study design (e.g., chronic vs. acute dosing) has made it difficult to compare the results of these studies to studies using hallucinogenic doses. 

Lastly, and perhaps most significantly, the lack of adequate placebos has been a major barrier to understanding the necessity of an ASC to therapeutic effects. Without good controls, answering this question may be impossible.

You recently led a Research Topic in Frontiers in Pharmacology entitled ‘What is up with psychedelics anyway?’ Can you tell us a little more about this – what it was designed to achieve?

The underlying purpose of this special issue is to provide a venue for the publication of research related to psychedelic-induced altered states of consciousness and their therapeutic benefits. Currently, articles related to altered states of consciousness have limited publishing options, and those options that do exist may not be widely read by others studying psychedelic drug action. We hoped that by providing a more accessible and more widely read publication space for both clinical and pre-clinical researchers, we could begin to address the question of whether altered states of consciousness are required for the therapeutic benefits. 

The editorial team consists of myself, Dr Sarah Mennenga, Dr Candace Lewis, and Dr Stephen Helms Tillery. When we first met to discuss the idea behind this issue, we debated its focus; should it be broad or more focused? In the end, we decided that the field would benefit from the more inclusive perspective we adopted. 

The special issue now includes research using qualitative, quantitative, human, and animal methods to investigate this topic, and includes investigators from across the world. We see the inclusive nature of this issue as a real strength.

How important is it for large and influential journals such as Frontiers in Pharmacology, which has recently seen its Impact Factor increase to 5.988 and its CiteScore reach 6.6, to cover such topics as psychedelics?

Public and medical perceptions regarding psychedelics have recently shifted towards the positive, as increasing numbers of clinical trials have demonstrated their therapeutic benefits in some contexts.

Therefore, it is paramount that any peer-reviewed research performed with psychedelic drugs be published in an open access and high-profile manner to allow and encourage more well-informed decisions to be made regarding clinical trials, drug policy, and basic science experimental designs.

Frontiers in Pharmacology has provided just such an opportunity to the field.

To focus in on some of the themes of the Research Topic: how can we better inform our understanding of psychoactive impact vs. biological impact of sub-hallucinogenic doses that may have anti-inflammatory or pain-reducing effects and how either of these may impact mental health?

Whether we consider sub-hallucinogenic or higher doses, the anti-inflammatory effects of many psychedelics may be essential to any therapeutic benefits. There are countless studies exploring the role of inflammation in psychiatric disease, especially neuroinflammation, and such psychedelic effects would certainly tap into those mechanisms. 

Unfortunately, these anti-inflammatory effects are largely understudied in the psychedelics field. Most research with psychedelics has focused on their neural and/or behavioral effects, so there is a real need for more research in this field. Additionally, experiments investigating the effects of psychedelics on the periphery (i.e., gut microbiome or cardiac and smooth muscle tissue) may uncover novel mechanisms for therapeutic effects. For example, modulation of the gut-brain axis may serve as a novel therapeutic route for treating a variety of mental health disorders. 

Lastly, such studies may also uncover novel uses for psychedelics in the treatment of other diseases not directly related to mental health. For example, the same serotonin receptors psychedelics bind within the brain and cause hallucinations (5-HT2A) are also found in the gut and mediate intestinal motility. So, it is necessary that we expand our research to focus on the full spectrum of effects psychedelics have, not just those taking place at synapses. 

How can mechanism of action research help us understand the role of psychedelics as biological response modifiers?

Understanding how a drug works (its mechanism) is the key to unlocking a few important pieces of information. First, it can inform us of the drug’s effectiveness. If a novel drug’s mechanism is similar to an existing effective compound, this would suggest it may work as effectively. If it’s a new mechanism, then we need to spend more time evaluating the effectiveness of the drug. 

Additionally, identifying new mechanisms can inform us of a second key piece of information: the biological basis of the disease. In other words, if a drug affects target A, it’s likely that target A is disrupted by the disease state. This information then provides us with an opportunity to develop better drugs to affect target A, or we can use this information to help identify at-risk individuals to prevent the onset of the disease. 

Lastly understanding a drug’s mechanism can help us understand what undesirable effects a drug may have. For example, psilocin (the active form of psilocybin) has a relatively high affinity for serotonin 5-HT2B receptors, which are essential for healthy cardiac function. Its action at this target could raise concerns about the potential for heart complications if the drug is used clinically or recreationally.

In general, more research is desperately needed on the mechanism of action of psychedelic drugs. One could say there is still a lot of “low-hanging fruit” in this area, but with barriers of high-cost, lack of access, legal restrictions, and lack of adequate standardized controls, these questions are harder to answer than in other fields. A better understanding of the effects these drugs have at the cellular level would help provide a foundation for defining their effects at the level of the whole animal. 

For example, LSD and psilocybin both bind with the same receptor (5-HT2A); however, upon binding they activate different intracellular second messenger signaling pathways (beta-arrestin vs. Gq-GPCR, respectively), causing different down-stream effects on the cell. The differential activation of these cellular signaling pathways by LSD and psilocybin may explain why they elicit somewhat different biological and behavioral responses.

Can a better understanding of altered states of consciousness (ASC) inform the therapeutic understanding of the mystical experience, and can it inform our understanding of the role of compounds such as ketamine as much-needed “fast-acting” antidepressants?

It is unknown if an ASC is a prerequisite for achieving antidepressant effects with psychedelics. Studying non-drug-induced ASCs (hypnosis, meditation, etc.) and comparing them to psychedelic-induced ASCs may uncover common physiological mechanisms. If ASCs are the sole mechanism by which psychedelic drugs exert their therapeutic effects, it may be possible to induce these same effects without exposure to the drug. 

Additionally, identifying the brain regions participating in the psychedelic-induced “mystical experience” may help pinpoint where in the brain psychedelic drugs exert their therapeutic effects, and perhaps even suggest the brain regions involved in the pathogenesis of mental health disorders.

Similarly, identifying the receptors and cellular signaling pathways activated during ASCs could suggest therapeutic targets for the development of more focused medications. 

Can mechanism of action research inform our understanding of pharmacological factors vs. non-pharmacological factors of the compounds’ effects (set/setting), such as how the compounds impact neurobiological responses to enriched environments, and whether or not this has therapeutic effects? And, therefore, how the use of these compounds can be implemented in healthcare?

This is an essential question in the field of psychedelics. There is substantial evidence that the set/setting has a significant impact on the effectiveness of these drugs, especially the individual’s expectations. This is one of the reasons why more research is needed with healthy volunteers and why better controls (environmental and placebo) are needed in clinical studies. Additionally, we must know how the set and setting affect the targets of psychedelic drugs. For example, if set or setting bias 5-HT2A levels, we would expect them to affect the hallucinations caused by psychedelics. Thus, we must understand both the mechanisms of the drugs, but also the mechanisms of the set and setting. 

To address these questions, we need to compliment clinical and whole-animal work with research using ex vivo and in vitro methods, to remove the “emotional” and “sensory” response to environmental stimuli that may influence the subjective response to psychedelics. 

For example, cell culture experiments with ex vivo brain tissue could determine if changes in synaptic plasticity, receptor density, or gene expression, among other things, change during and after psychedelic drug exposure, in the absence of any particular setting. Should these compounds be made more widely available for healthcare uses, we should expect their use to occur in a variety of uncontrollable settings. Therefore, optimizing their dosage, route of delivery, etc. must be done in a way that embraces variance in set and setting.

Can it help us understand psychedelic-induced neuroplasticity and/or give us a broader understanding of mental health in general?

Mechanism exists at multiple levels of the organism, from cognition to molecules. To understand any disease and the best way to treat it, we must understand the disease’s mechanisms, as well as the mechanisms of the drug we wish to use to treat it. By matching the two sets of mechanisms, we can best tailor the drug to the disease. Psychedelics have broad effects, from cognitive to molecular.

The unique mechanism of each drug may even suggest the particular mental health disorder it is best suited to treat. Without more research on the mechanisms of psychedelics, and a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms, all drug development is basically a guessing game.

Looking beyond the scope of your Research Topic, what other areas could future article collections in Frontiers in Pharmacology focus on to either help fill the aforementioned knowledge gaps or address completely different areas related to psychedelics?

Some suggestions for future issues include:

  • Molecular effects of psychedelics (research using ex vivo tissue, isolated cells, or other reductionist methodology)
  • Effects of psychedelics on non-central systems (peripheral nervous system, gut, renal function etc.,)
  • Mechanisms of non-drug induced Altered States of Consciousness

Attribution details

Matthew McMurray, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
Center for Neuroscience and Behavior
Miami University

Dr Ryan Rakoczy
Department of Psychology
Miami University
90 N. Patterson Ave.
Oxford, OH 45056

[activecampaign form=52]

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Psilocybin analogue shows positive results in Phase 2 depression study



Psilocybin analogue shows positive results in Phase 2 depression study

Cybin has announced positive Phase 2 topline safety and efficacy data for its proprietary deuterated psilocybin analogue – CYB003 – for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).

Results from Cybin’s study have shown that 79% of patients were in remission from depression at six weeks after receiving two doses of CYB003.

CYB003 demonstrated a large improvement in symptoms after one dose and a total of 79% of patients were responsive to the treatment. The compound also demonstrated an excellent safety profile in doses tested, with all reported adverse events mild to moderate and self–limiting.

Additionally, Cybin has stated that the magnitude of improvement was superior compared to approved antidepressants and recently reported data with other psychedelics, stating that the effects translate into an unprecedented effect size.

The company has said that the results compare favorably to pooled data from 232 industry studies of current standard-of-care antidepressants, SSRIs, submitted to the FDA.

The announcement follows Phase 2 interim results in early November 2023, which demonstrated that CYB003 saw a “rapid, robust and statistically significant reduction in symptoms of depression three weeks following a single 12mg dose compared to placebo”.

Cybin CEO, Doug Drysdale, stated: “We are delighted to share that CYB003 achieved the primary efficacy endpoint in this study and showed rapid and statistically significant improvements in depression symptoms after a single dose, with a clear incremental benefit of a second dose, resulting in four out of five patients in remission from their depression at six weeks.

“This is an impressive finding and follows on from the unprecedented interim results we announced earlier this month.”

Drysdale emphasised that the strength of the data will support CYB003 into Phase 3 of the study.

Cybin CMO, Amir Inamdar, added: “The significant reduction in depression symptoms observed in our Phase 2 study is highly gratifying.

“At the three-week primary efficacy endpoint, a single 12mg dose of CYB003 showed a rapid, robust, and highly statistically significant improvement in depression symptoms compared to placebo, with a -14.08 point difference in change from baseline in MADRS. 

“This translated into a very large effect size. Similar significant and robust effects were also seen with a single 16mg dose, which resulted in an improvement in symptoms of depression as measured using the MADRS total score by about 13 points versus placebo. 

“These effects were evident on day one with the 16mg dose and were also highly statistically significant. When data from 12mg and 16mg are pooled, these robust effects are maintained. Further, with two doses, response and remission rates in excess of 75% were observed with CYB003 (12mg). 

“With these findings in hand, we are encouraged by the potential of CYB003 to help those with MDD and look forward to progressing to a multinational, multisite Phase 3 study early next year.”

Cybin is planning on submitting topline data to the FDA with an aim to hold a Phase 2 meeting in Q1 of 2024, with further 12-week durability data from Phase 2 CYB003 expected in Q1, and recruitment for the Phase 3 study anticipated to begin by the end of Q1 2024.

Continue Reading


Clerkenwell Health calls for volunteers to support groundbreaking psychedelic research



Clerkenwell Health calls for volunteers to support groundbreaking psychedelic research

Mental health research provider Clerkenwell Health is calling for volunteers to join its groundbreaking clinical trials that will research whether psychedelics can provide effective treatments for complex mental health conditions.

Clerkenwell is seeking a diverse group of volunteers from across the UK between 18 and 65 years old to take part in the trials if they suffer from a relevant condition. 

The trials, which will be conducted at Clerkenwell Health’s purpose-built facility near Harley Street in London, are being run in partnership with a number of world-leading drug developers to test whether psychedelic drugs – often combined with talking therapy – can offer a new approach to treating a variety of mental health illnesses.

See also  Clerkenwell Health is launching a free UK psychedelic therapist training programme

Clerkenwell Health is seeking volunteers for trials that look to find cures for a range of conditions, including PTSD, depression, alcohol use disorder and anorexia. 

Many of the conditions have few successful treatment options and Clerkenwell’s innovative methods of combining psychedelics with therapy aim to to treat these problems more holistically, providing long-term quality of life for patients.

Chief Scientific Officer at Clerkenwell Health, Dr Henry Fisher, said: “With the current system for treating mental health disorders simply not working, we’re calling for patients to help identify the next wave of treatments. 

“These have the potential to be groundbreaking for the millions of people across the UK who are affected by poor mental health.

“The status quo for mental health treatment has not only resulted in patients experiencing debilitating side-effects, huge waiting lists and high relapse rates, but is costly, complicated and broadly ineffective. 

“By participating in upcoming clinical trials, patients have an opportunity to make a valuable contribution to growing research which will support the development of the next generation treatments for mental health conditions.”

According to MIND, approximately 1 in 4 people in the UK will be affected by a mental health condition each year and with a significant rise in people contacting mental health services in recent years, there has never been a more desperate need to identify new and innovative treatments.

Given the challenges facing the country’s health service and with mental health challenges on the rise, the search for volunteers to test effective treatments has never been more pressing. 

Clerkenwell has stated, in this regard, that it has gone national with its search for volunteers in an effort to deliver medical breakthroughs in mental health akin to the Polio clinical trials in the 20th Century.

Continue Reading


Paper explores extended difficulties following psychedelic trips



Paper explores extended difficulties following psychedelic trips

A new paper has explored the extended difficulties experienced by some people following psychedelic drug use and discusses psychedelic harm reduction.

While multiple studies have shown that psychedelics can be safe when administered appropriately, some people experience difficulties following their use. These difficulties can last anywhere from a few days to years.

With a rise in clinical research surrounding these compounds, there is a drive to change drug policy and several places have already implemented progressive approaches to accessing these therapies such as decriminalisation or including them on authorised medical access schemes. 

In light of these developments, it is vital to understand the potential risks associated with psychedelic use and what actions can be taken to reduce these risks.

The paper has been published in Plos One and authored by a team of leading psychedelic scientists from the Universities of Exeter, Greenwich and Queen Mary, University College London and Royal Holloway, New York University and the Perception Restoration Foundation.

Extended difficulties following psychedelic use

The team of researchers has gathered data on the context of use, nature and duration of these difficulties and explored risk factors and perceived causes that may contribute to these experiences. 

The most common forms of extended difficulty that the team uncovered include symptoms such as anxiety/fear and existential struggle, as well as social disconnection, depersonalisation and derealisation.

“For approximately one-third of the participants, problems persisted for over a year, and for a sixth, they endured for more than three years,” the authors write.

The findings revealed that the length of time these experiences last following psychedelic use could be predicted by the participants’ knowledge of dose and drug type, and that the experiences were shorter if a participant had taken part in a guided psychedelic experience. 

Additionally, the most common length of time such difficulties lasted was between one and three years. When asked about mental illness onset following the psychedelic experience, 18.8% said they had gone on to be diagnosed with a mental illness, while 76.8% said they had not.

The authors write: “Our findings support the results of Simonsson et al., who found that anxiety was the most common enduring difficulty, based on quantitative questionnaire data and Bouso et al’s study of the Global Ayahuasca Survey, in which ‘feeling nervous, anxious or on edge’ was the second most common adverse mental health effect. Our findings also suggest that a Sense of disconnection from others was within the top five most prevalent themes, as did the studies by Simonsson et al. and Bouso et al. 

“Some extended adverse effects that were quite common in other studies weren’t so common in our data set–for example, feeling a harmful connection to the spirit world was reported by 14% of respondents to the Global Ayahuasca Survey but by less than 4% of our data set, which may suggest some forms of difficulty are particularly associated with certain psychedelic substances and/or their associated cultures.”

Reducing risk factors

The authors suggest a number of actions that could be taken to reduce these risks.

Highlighting that, as anxiety and fear are some of the most commonly reported difficulties, the authors suggest that all legal psychedelic experience providers give guidance on methods for “self-soothing and overcoming bouts of anxiety following the retreat, clinical trial or ceremony.”

Further suggestions include informing participants of potential harms and risks and advising participants that the integration process may take some time, and what practices can be done to help people cope with difficulties. The authors say these practices will be explored in an upcoming paper.

The team writes: “We envisage using the information in this study, and accompanying future papers that focus on social support and forms of coping used by those with enduring difficulties, to provide structured guidance and training to psychedelic retreats, therapists and clinical trial centers about the potential for adverse experiences, what the potential risk factors are and what can be done to help individuals who report such extended difficulties.”

Continue Reading